From RomanceWiki
Revision as of 04:56, 18 July 2012 by Frankieroyle (Talk | contribs) (asking for help)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

To talk to the editors, start typing below. Use the signature button (second from right above) to add your username, if you wish.

Dear RomanceWiki,

I see that there is a page devoted to Love Inspired Historical, however, there is no link available on the "Category: Numbered Series" page. I would like to ask that a link to the Love Inspired Historical by the Numbers page be included on the appropriate Category: Numbered Series page please. Thank you!

Hi RomanceWiki,

would you please unlock the Harlequin Romance By The Numbers page? The years 2008 and 2009 have already been added to the site, but you can't access them via the "Harlequin Romance By The Numbers" page. -- --ursel 04:41, 20 December 2008 (PST)

Done. --Kay T 12:09, 23 December 2008 (PST)

Hi RomanceWiki,

I have a bit of a problem with the Category:XXXX Releases. I - and others - use it to categorize an unknown release date, and I must confess I didn't look fist because it seems so logical! Maybe the fiction genre can be moved to another category? --ursel 06:13, 30 July 2008 (PDT)

Hi again RomanceWiki,

Just wanted to let you know that I did this month's edition of my monthly column for eCataromance ("The Life of e") about RW. Please visit this page: and you will see the link for the article. I hope it helps spread the word about this great site!

Diana Laurence --Dlau 17:38, 30 April 2008 (PDT)

Hello RomanceWiki!

[I have no idea if this is how I should respond to your communication, so I hope you read this. I tried several ways, but I'm thinking this is probably the best one.]

First of all, thanks for your warm welcome!

I apologize for not following protocol and thank you for pointing it out in such a warm way. I have put in all the links for the reviews of my books this morning. The reason I didn't originally, was because some of them are older and the links are no longer live; however, I have put in all the links as they originally were, and hopefully most are still good.

The reason I quote the review extensively is also because review sites do not retain their posts forever and I hate to lose the review content. I agree with you that some of these review excerpts are on the lengthy side, but they are all taken from my website, and when I post them I always let the review site know I have done so. I've never been asked by any site to remove or reduce them, so I think they are acceptible.

That said, you are correct though that I'm sure all these review sites would appreciate the links, and it has always been my policy to include them on my website. I just got lazy! There you have it!  :-) But you are right, I should have taken the time. All is corrected now and I hope will be acceptible also to RomanceWiki. Please let me know if not.

This site is fabulous and I think will be a huge benefit to romance readers. Keep up the great work!

Diana --Dlau 07:05, 11 April 2008 (PDT)

Ah, so there you are.

Listen, do you also serve as Bureaucrats (ala the Big Wiki)? Because I'd like to change my username but I can't do it myself. If you could do it for me, I'd like to change it from Saradonati to

Rosina Lippi/Sara Donati

Thanks for your help.

I just figured out some of the navigation. I listed a few of the books I have in a previous post but if you would like me to send you a complete list of the ones that I have please let me know. There are quite a few so far. --Teresa58 10:54, 12 March 2008 (PDT)


I guess we have not been paying attention much. See this wonder addition to the wiki.

--Kay T 23:14, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Hello ... um help I am not sure I know what I am doing here or how to do it, I hope this will work. I realy need someone to talk me through this so I can get the hang of it, I have been trying to figure it out for ages--Frankieroyle 04:56, 18 July 2012 (PDT)